Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was introduced 8 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the WG-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-H15 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-H15
| WG-50 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 89 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-H15 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 and the WG-50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and WG-50.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to give you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $280 |