Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H15 was launched 9 years prior to the WG-6 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the WG-6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-H15 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-H15
| WG-6 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 98 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-H15 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh WG-6 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H15 vs the WG-6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and WG-6 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and WG-6.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $271 |
