Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung CL5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") have different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was released 11 months after the CL5 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H15 scores against the CL5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-H15 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-H15
| CL5 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung CL5
| EX-H15 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 has got external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung CL5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the CL5.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and CL5 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and CL5.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H15 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-H15 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer EX-H15 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called | - | PL10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 141g (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $391 |
