Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0e5/ee0e57c6de5b6590c0c70f89b85280638d136a77" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is very similar but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-H15 was announced 3 years prior to the EX2F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-H15 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-H15
EX2F | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung EX2F
EX-H15 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung EX2F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 against the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6983c/6983ce2e6bc979b4ea84ed1034f8f7e9a678efd4" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and EX2F is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01552/0155256f1ad6c30ecad5b7e84e3cc3d432cb5c4a" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and EX2F.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H15 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-H15 will deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51701/517010f6c6de31f0ad631d58ca9173622428a074" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1653d/1653d77243421476cd604834a6fbf81a7946a705" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung EX2F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $478 |