Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
59 Imaging
49 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung GX-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H15 was manufactured 3 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-H15 matches up against the GX-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung GX-10
| EX-H15 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 210k | Sharper screen (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-H15
| GX-10 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung GX-10
| EX-H15 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 provides physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung GX-10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the GX-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and GX-10 is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and GX-10.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-H15 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent EX-H15 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $850 |
