Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was revealed 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 4G which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H15 scores vs the Galaxy Camera 4G in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-H15 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-H15
| Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 32 months |
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-H15 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H15 and the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G to resolve extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | - |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $550 |