Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was launched 20 months before the MV800 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-H15 scores vs the MV800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-H15 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-H15
| MV800 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung MV800
| EX-H15 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 against the MV800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and MV800 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and MV800.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung MV800 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $499 |
