Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-H15 was manufactured 11 months later than the SL202 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-H15 grades vs the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung SL202

 EX-H15 SL202 
LaunchedJanuary 2010February 2009More recent by 11 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-H15

 SL202 EX-H15 

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL202

 EX-H15 SL202 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 against the SL202.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and SL202.

As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-H15 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H15
Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
34
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
25
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Sports photography advice
Samsung SL202 Sports photography advice
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
64
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
57
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography features
46
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
27
pretty wide (28mm)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Vlogging details
Samsung SL202 Vlogging details
28
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
27
pretty wide (28mm)
offers face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H15 Samsung SL202
Other name - PL50
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-06 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 161 gr (0.35 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $300 $140