Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL65
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung SL620, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H15 was unveiled 11 months later than the SL620 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-H15 scores vs the SL620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-H15 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-H15
| SL620 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL620
| EX-H15 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 has physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 against the SL620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and SL620 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The visual here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and SL620.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-H15 to give you greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called | - | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $200 |