Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as IT100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was manufactured 11 months after the SL820 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the SL820 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung SL820
| EX-H15 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-H15
| SL820 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL820
| EX-H15 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung SL820 has sizing of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 and the SL820.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SL820 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and SL820.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H15 to produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL820 |
| Otherwise known as | - | IT100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $280 |
