Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung ST700, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was revealed 12 months before the ST700 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the ST700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung ST700. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-H15 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-H15
| ST700 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung ST700
| EX-H15 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 has got outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has dimensions of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung ST700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the ST700.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and ST700 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and ST700.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung ST700 to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $280 |