Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was manufactured 12 months before the ST95 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H15 grades vs the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-H15 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-H15
| ST95 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung ST95
| EX-H15 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-H15 versus the ST95.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and ST95.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $145 |
