Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H15 was unveiled around the same time to the TL240 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-H15 scores against the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung TL240
EX-H15 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-H15
TL240 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung TL240
EX-H15 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | January 2010 | Similar generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 has external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H15 versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and TL240 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and TL240.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos although you will want to take the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung TL240 |
Also referred to as | - | ST5000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 160 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $171 |