Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB210, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was revealed 18 months earlier than the WB210 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-H15 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-H15
| WB210 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB210
| EX-H15 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 provides outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the WB210.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and WB210.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos although you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $279 |
