Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was announced 4 years before the WB250F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-H15 scores vs the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-H15 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-H15
| WB250F | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-H15 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 comes with exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and WB250F.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you will want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |