Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

The following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-H15 was unveiled 5 years before the WB35F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-H15 grades vs the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-H15 WB35F 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-H15

 WB35F EX-H15 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2010Newer by 48 months

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-H15 WB35F 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the WB35F.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and WB35F.

Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
34
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H15
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
64
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
70
lighter than competition (194 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-H15
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
46
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
43
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
28
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic port
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-H15 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-01-06 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 161 gr (0.35 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $300 $130