Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was brought out 24 months before the WB850F making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-H15 grades against the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung WB850F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-H15 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-H15
| WB850F | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-H15 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 and the WB850F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and WB850F.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB850F to give you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung WB850F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $599 |