Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-H15 was brought out 24 months before the WB850F making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-H15 grades against the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung WB850F

 EX-H15 WB850F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-H15

 WB850F EX-H15 
IntroducedJanuary 2012January 2010More recent by 24 months
Display resolution614k461kClearer display (+153k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB850F

 EX-H15 WB850F 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 and the WB850F.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and WB850F.

To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB850F to give you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H15
Portrait photography with Samsung WB850F
34
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
43
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect focus
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Street photography details
Samsung WB850F Street photography details
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (250 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Sports photography highlights
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-H15
Travel photography with Samsung WB850F
64
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than competition (250 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-H15
Landscape photography with Samsung WB850F
46
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse recording
49
manual focus
decently wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H15
Vlogging with Samsung WB850F
28
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone port
34
decently wide (23mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (250g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Samsung WB850F
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Samsung WB850F
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-H15 Samsung WB850F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-01-06 2012-01-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 161g (0.35 lb) 250g (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $300 $599