Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0e5/ee0e57c6de5b6590c0c70f89b85280638d136a77" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-H15 was unveiled 3 years prior to the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
EX-H15 | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Casio EX-H15
DP2 Merrill | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 25 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
EX-H15 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3498/d3498de2a1d332694a723bf1010eec85c9d166ce" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and DP2 Merrill is 93 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4770/a4770b509fbdfff263e0819ef45066b8f743bc62" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The photograph below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer more detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cdd9/2cdd907fdac4286846c59815b5274cbb5407ae03" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/101ee/101ee94cc52cb06aa708c884faa9263b289eefe4" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $931 |