Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-H15 was manufactured 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H15 grades vs the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H15 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H15

 DP2 Quattro EX-H15 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2010More recent by 49 months
Display resolution920k461kClearer display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H15 DP2 Quattro 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Portrait photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography factors
34
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Street photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography highlights
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
48
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
64
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
46
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
59
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3")
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Vlogging features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging features
28
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone socket
9
no video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-H15 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-06 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 161 gr (0.35 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $300 $931