Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was manufactured 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H15 grades vs the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-H15 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H15
| DP2 Quattro | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-H15 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the DP2 Quattro.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $931 |
