Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Refreshed by Sigma SD1 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sigma. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the SD1 (15MP) is very close but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was announced 8 months prior to the SD1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-H15 grades versus the SD1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma SD1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma SD1
| EX-H15 | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Casio EX-H15
| SD1 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD1
| EX-H15 | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 has got external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 and the SD1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SD1 is 93 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and SD1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sigma SD1 will render extra detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 2 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $2,339 |