Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Released September 2006
- Replaced the Sigma SD10
- Updated by Sigma SD15
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was launched 3 years later than the SD14 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H15 scores versus the SD14 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma SD14. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma SD14
| EX-H15 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | More recent by 40 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 150k | Sharper screen (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Casio EX-H15
| SD14 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD14
| EX-H15 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma SD14 has proportions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the SD14.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SD14 is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and SD14.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-H15 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD14 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 750g (1.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $198 |