Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H15 was announced 7 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the SD9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma SD9
EX-H15 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | November 2002 | Fresher by 87 months | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 130k | Sharper display (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-H15
SD9 | EX-H15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD9
EX-H15 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 versus the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-H15 will resolve greater detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $3,001 |