Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-H15 versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was brought out 7 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H15 grades versus the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma Quattro
| EX-H15 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-H15
| Quattro | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+1159k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma Quattro
| EX-H15 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H15 versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 against the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and Quattro.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will deliver greater detail having its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 29MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $738 |