Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Superseded the Sony A3000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was launched 5 years prior to the a3500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the a3500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sony a3500
| EX-H15 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Casio EX-H15
| a3500 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sony a3500
| EX-H15 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has sizing of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 and the a3500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and a3500 is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and a3500.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-H15 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony a3500 will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 411g (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $398 |