Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are designed by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the EX-S200 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was launched 2 months after the EX-S200 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the EX-S200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-S200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-S200
EX-H20G | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-H20G
EX-S200 | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-S200
EX-H20G | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | August 2010 | Same age | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G provides physical measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Casio EX-S200 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G versus the EX-S200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and EX-S200 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and EX-S200.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of files though you should really factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2010-08-03 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 132g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $0 |