Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-H20G versus Casio EX-Z270, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Casio. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and EX-Z270 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and EX-Z270 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was brought out 21 months after the EX-Z270 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-H20G grades versus the EX-Z270 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-Z270. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-Z270 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-Z270
| EX-H20G | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Casio EX-H20G
| EX-Z270 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-Z270
| EX-H20G | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z270 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G versus Casio EX-Z270 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G vs the EX-Z270.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and EX-Z270 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and EX-Z270.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Casio EX-H20G will offer more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z270 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-7.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 111 gr (0.24 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-80 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $0 |