Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the EX-ZR400 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was brought out 3 years earlier than the EX-ZR400 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-H20G grades against the EX-ZR400 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H20G | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Casio EX-H20G
| EX-ZR400 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H20G | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G features external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR400 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G against the EX-ZR400.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and EX-ZR400 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and EX-ZR400.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 30.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $0 |