Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released January 2012
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F750EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was introduced 15 months before the Fujifilm F750EXR which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the Fujifilm F750EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm F750EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Casio EX-H20G
Fujifilm F750EXR | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F750EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Fujifilm F750EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F750EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G versus the Fujifilm F750EXR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F750EXR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The image below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F750EXR.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F750EXR will give you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F750EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 234g (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $445 |