Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H20G was manufactured 22 months before the Fujifilm F800EXR which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H20G matches up against the Fujifilm F800EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm F800EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Casio EX-H20G
Fujifilm F800EXR | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 22 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F800EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F800EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the Fujifilm F800EXR.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F800EXR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F800EXR.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will give you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F800EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2012-07-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 232g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 143 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $330 |