Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F900EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was introduced 3 years before the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-H20G grades vs the Fujifilm F900EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio EX-H20G
Fujifilm F900EXR | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-H20G | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Fujifilm F900EXR has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F900EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G against the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F900EXR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-H20G using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Fujifilm F900EXR will give greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | EXR II |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $380 |