Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was launched 15 months later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-H20G grades vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-H20G
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has got outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H20G to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-H20G is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.8" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 260g (0.57 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $900 |