Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
38 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak C135, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the C135 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was released 15 months earlier than the C135 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H20G matches up vs the C135 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Kodak EasyShare C135. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Kodak C135
| EX-H20G | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-H20G
| C135 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak C135
| EX-H20G | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has proportions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak C135 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G against the C135.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and C135 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and C135.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you will need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $0 |
