Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak M530, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the M530 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was launched 9 months after the M530 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H20G scores vs the M530 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Kodak EasyShare M530. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Kodak M530 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Kodak M530
| EX-H20G | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 9 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Casio EX-H20G
| M530 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak M530
| EX-H20G | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G offers outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Kodak M530 has dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak M530 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G vs the M530.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and M530 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and M530.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H20G to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak M530 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak EasyShare M530 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak EasyShare M530 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $110 |