Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76393/7639345edb59e3ad89924509e09513679161f6b4" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H20G front Casio Exilim EX-H20G front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea1a/5ea1a2dcd0db3a5f518a33b0c5b509e82763f6fa" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-H20G was revealed 11 months before the Easyshare M5370 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G matches up against the Easyshare M5370 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
EX-H20G | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-H20G
Easyshare M5370 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak Easyshare M5370
EX-H20G | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the Easyshare M5370.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69979/699798d10b117ecdab88bda945c4bc5b556b503b" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and Easyshare M5370 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21da7/21da7d78ff3ed80d0892004254609ae30f257f10" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and Easyshare M5370.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/498f3/498f3016be392bd7463319f6510bfa403069ed0b" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5229/c52296db2a140dd284735fa3229b5e927693b54c" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2011-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 150g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $160 |