Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
91
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Released September 2010
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The EX-H20G was revealed 11 months before the Easyshare M5370 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G matches up against the Easyshare M5370 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-H20G Easyshare M5370 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-H20G

 Easyshare M5370 EX-H20G 
IntroducedSeptember 2011September 2010Fresher by 11 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-H20G Easyshare M5370 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the Easyshare M5370.

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and Easyshare M5370 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and Easyshare M5370.

To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography highlights
35
manual focus
good MP (14MP)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
34
MP count decent (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H20G
Street photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Sports photography features
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography features
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
29
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Travel photography advice
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography advice
60
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
72
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography highlights
46
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
43
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Vlogging info
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging info
27
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
has face detect autofocus
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-H20G vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GKodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-H20G Kodak Easyshare M5370
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-09-20 2011-09-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focus range 7cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-1, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 216g (0.48 lbs) 150g (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $300 $160