Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was announced 5 years earlier than the S9900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-H20G grades versus the S9900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Nikon S9900
EX-H20G | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-H20G
S9900 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | September 2010 | More recent by 53 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Nikon S9900
EX-H20G | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has got outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G against the S9900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and S9900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and S9900.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9900 to produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 289 grams (0.64 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |