Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2017
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H20G versus Nikon W300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the W300 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was revealed 7 years earlier than the W300 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-H20G scores against the W300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Nikon Coolpix W300. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Nikon W300
| EX-H20G | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Casio EX-H20G
| W300 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 81 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Nikon W300
| EX-H20G | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H20G versus Nikon W300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H20G vs the W300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and W300 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and W300.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Nikon W300 to produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 280 images |
| Style of battery | - | Built-in |
| Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $387 |