Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe EX-H20G was introduced 15 months after the FE-4000 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-H20G scores vs the FE-4000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus FE-4000. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus FE-4000
EX-H20G | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 15 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-H20G
FE-4000 | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-4000
EX-H20G | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G features outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G and the FE-4000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and FE-4000 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and FE-4000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also called as | - | X-925 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $130 |