Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000

Portability
91
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Olympus FE-4000 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Also referred to as X-925
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

The EX-H20G was introduced 15 months after the FE-4000 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-H20G scores vs the FE-4000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus FE-4000

 EX-H20G FE-4000 
RevealedSeptember 2010July 2009More modern by 15 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-H20G

 FE-4000 EX-H20G 

Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-4000

 EX-H20G FE-4000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G features outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G and the FE-4000.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and FE-4000 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and FE-4000.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H20G
Portrait photography with Olympus FE-4000
35
manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H20G
Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition (216g)
55
lighter than others in class (136g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Sports photography factors
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography factors
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H20G as a Travel photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
60
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (216 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
62
lighter than others in class (136g)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H20G as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Landscape photography camera
46
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
28
really wide (26mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G as a Vlogging camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Vlogging camera
27
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
heavier than competition (216 grams)
28
really wide (26mm)
lighter than others in class (136 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-4000
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GOlympus FE-4000
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H20G Olympus FE-4000
Also called as - X-925
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-09-20 2009-07-22
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.6-5.9
Macro focusing distance 7cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 216 grams (0.48 lbs) 136 grams (0.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $300 $130