Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-5020, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was launched 15 months later than the FE-5020 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H20G scores against the FE-5020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus FE-5020. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-H20G | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-H20G
| FE-5020 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-H20G | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has got exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5020 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-5020 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the FE-5020.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and FE-5020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and FE-5020.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-H20G to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $160 |