Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was manufactured 21 months later than the SP-565UZ making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H20G grades vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-H20G | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 21 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-H20G
| SP-565UZ | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-H20G | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G has physical measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the SP-565UZ.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and SP-565UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H20G to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lb) | 413 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $400 |