Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10
Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Portability
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
Olympus SZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced February 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SZ-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was released 4 months earlier than the SZ-10 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-H20G scores vs the SZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus SZ-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus SZ-10
| EX-H20G | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Casio EX-H20G
| SZ-10 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus SZ-10
| EX-H20G | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | February 2011 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G provides exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-10 has proportions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the SZ-10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and SZ-10 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and SZ-10.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images though you should really factor the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography factors
Olympus SZ-10 Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Street photography information
Olympus SZ-10 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition (216g)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Sports photography information
Olympus SZ-10 Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (28-504mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (220 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Olympus SZ-10
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (216g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
long zoom (504mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
low battery power (220 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography advice
Olympus SZ-10 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low battery power (220 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Vlogging highlights
Olympus SZ-10 Vlogging highlights
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
heavier than competition (216g)
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus SZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus SZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |