Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as mju 7000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 7000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the 7000 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was introduced 21 months later than the 7000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-H20G matches up vs the 7000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus 7000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus 7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus 7000
| EX-H20G | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Casio EX-H20G
| 7000 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus 7000
| EX-H20G | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G offers exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus 7000 has specifications of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 7000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G and the 7000.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and 7000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and 7000.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-H20G to provide greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G provides an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 7000 |
| Also called as | - | mju 7000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 172g (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $280 |