Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H20G was introduced 6 years prior to the SH-3 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G matches up vs the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus SH-3
| EX-H20G | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-H20G
| SH-3 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 65 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus SH-3
| EX-H20G | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G vs the SH-3.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and SH-3 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus SH-3 to deliver extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography info
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14MP)
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
resolution is good (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-H20G
Street photography with Olympus SH-3
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than others in class (216g)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
offers touch focus
lighter than competition (271 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Sports photography features
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Travel photography highlights
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography highlights
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (216g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (271g)
offers touch focus
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography features
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Vlogging information
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging information
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (216 grams)
fairly wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than competition (271g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $579 |