Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-H20G was revealed 23 months prior to the SP-820UZ making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G grades vs the SP-820UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-H20G | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Casio EX-H20G
| SP-820UZ | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-H20G | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus SP-820UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H20G and the SP-820UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and SP-820UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and SP-820UZ.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images although you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 15.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 485g (1.07 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $299 |
