Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 6010, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the 6010 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was manufactured 15 months after the 6010 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores versus the 6010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus 6010
| EX-H20G | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 15 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Casio EX-H20G
| 6010 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus 6010
| EX-H20G | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G features external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6010 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 6010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G and the 6010.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and 6010 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and 6010.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |