Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was introduced 8 months after the 8010 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-H20G matches up against the 8010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus 8010
| EX-H20G | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 8 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Casio EX-H20G
| 8010 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus 8010
| EX-H20G | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G offers exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has sizing of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the 8010.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and 8010 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and 8010.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H20G to deliver more detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer EX-H20G is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $600 |