Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was introduced 3 years earlier than the XZ-10 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-H20G scores versus the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus XZ-10
| EX-H20G | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Casio EX-H20G
| XZ-10 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-10
| EX-H20G | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G offers physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G and the XZ-10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and XZ-10.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $428 |