Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
![Casio Exilim EX-H20G front Casio Exilim EX-H20G front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-H20G/Casio-EX-H20G-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10/Olympus-XZ-10-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H20G was introduced 3 years earlier than the XZ-10 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-H20G scores versus the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus XZ-10
EX-H20G | XZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Casio EX-H20G
XZ-10 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-10
EX-H20G | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G offers physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G and the XZ-10.
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H20G-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H20G-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and XZ-10.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind in sensor technology.
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H20G-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H20G-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $428 |