Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was released 3 months before the TG-310 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-H20G grades against the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-H20G | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-H20G
| TG-310 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-310
| EX-H20G | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 | January 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G and the TG-310.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and TG-310 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and TG-310.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution so you should expect similar quality of files though you need to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $0 |