Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-H20G was introduced 15 months earlier than the TG-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H20G matches up against the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus TG-320
EX-H20G | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-H20G
TG-320 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-320
EX-H20G | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the TG-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and TG-320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-H20G will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $0 |