Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was released 3 years earlier than the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-H20G | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-H20G
| TG-630 iHS | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-H20G | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has got external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The photograph here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and TG-630 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $200 |