Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was launched 5 years prior to the TG-4 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G scores against the TG-4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus TG-4
| EX-H20G | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-H20G
| TG-4 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 55 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-4
| EX-H20G | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G comes with physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G against the TG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and TG-4.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $379 |